An analysis of documentary bowling for columbine by michael moore

Gun loving is as American as creating a pie on thanksgiving, although he shows more opinions antigun related, he doesn 't make opinions up for his viewers, he used rhetorical questions which allow audience think about what they may be watching.

Moore or possibly an editor looks to have taken audio of seven sentences, from five different parts of the speech, and a section given in a completely different speech, and molded them together.

Moore is a coward when planning on taking benefit of Heston who was simply in the early stages of Alzheimer 's Disease A brain disease resulting in a decrease in mental power. Such as gun violence may become more frequent if guns are so easily obtainable in the US and in local stores.

Then it cuts to video footage from the cafeteria on April 20,watching shots fired, students hiding scared under the lunch tables, bombs exploding, fires starting and students running to get out. A voiceover is played which explains how just ten days following the massacre, the NRA held a pro-gun rally in Denver despite the pleas of the community in mourning.

But what appears to be a simplistic anti-gun polemic broadens in scope, to tar the media, racism, greed and US foreign policy. Throughout the film, Charlton Heston is painted to be a villain. Michael investigates the Columbine High School massacre in which 12 students and 1 teacher were shot by 2 students in As he is making a documentary he has to stay away from stereotypical views so that it he does not give the viewers the idea that he is being biased.

The filmmaker is superficial along with his questions that are pointed, the utilization of witty, dry and mocking remarks are being used in his favour to lighten the actual fact that this 's a movie about people shooting others. The following is a transcript of the onscreen text in the Wonderful World segment: Moore uses his capacity to portray Heston as a villain, through using illusion of reality to converting the audience 's perspective.

The narrative used in the documentary does in some way simplify some issues regarding gun violence. He suggests that this might have very little educational value and the girls he interviews generally agree, noting how Harris and Klebold led introverted lifestyles and careless attitudes towards the game, and that nobody thought twice about it.

He relays the idea that people say poverty is the cause but challenges that idea with Canada having a higher unemployment rate than the United States. His first indiscretion happens within the title.

The contrapuntal music adds to the irony and the sequence closes with the immortal, unforgettable image for this era of the hijacked planes flying into the twin towers.

Michael Moore uses editing in some scenes of the documentary to make his point seem more powerful. Michael Moore is quite deliberate when he tries to elaborate his point of view with visuals and imagery such as the prominent use of archive footage and music which fits links to the video.

Moore is not from Colorado -- his question is generic, not meant to refer specifically to the Lockheed Martin plant in question. Although this film is highly successful and features very good important points, after a deeper analysis Moore misleads his audience many times and therefore over damages his argument and credibility.

This is an extremely effective way to put forward the story as it forces the audience to listen and be affected by the content of the call. This major scene, influences the audience to feel upset and the tone provides scared feeling, which reinforces the issue of gun control.

Moore uses such techniques to mock the staff, which helps him achieve his purpose, inadequately proving the 'truth ' over the evidence. The flashing by of the clips of individuals dying, being shot and interracial foreigners carrying American built guns aesthetically provides feeling of a mismanaged government.

Bowling For Columbine Essay

Following the scene vividly re-living the Columbine High shootings, Moore switches to the then NRA president, Charlton Heston, as he screams his famous five word line 'From my cold dead hands ' Heston, and waves a gun above his check out a roaring crowd. While vilifying the NRA, Moore takes things a step further.

He creates a rather powerful scene when he goes back to the columbine high school and talks to one of the teachers who witnessed the shootings years ago. I guess I don't see that specific connection because the missiles that you're talking about were built and designed to defend us from somebody else who would be aggressors against us.

This beginning of showing the empty corridors adds to the eerie quality of the footage, and the emptiness echoes the scenes of devastation and death which were present in this school.

Shocking and explosive newsflashes, strange circumstances, frustrated interviewees, sardonic twists, and animations all joined together into an hour and fifty-seven minutes, the movie is best referred to as a documentary for the new generation. Why does the United States have a problem with gun violence, more specifically, murders by firearm?

The inclusion of this struggle further demonises the store and, therefore when, only after Moore brings along the press, K-Mart agree to stop selling the bullets in their stores, the victory seems somehow more triumphant. MGM Home Entertainment, By including these elements, Moore is almost disregarding everything the man has said to be the ramblings of a mad man and something not to be considered in the debate.

At the core of this debate, many ask the question: All it would take from Moore would be one quip, or a single mocking camera angle, to turn the mother into a nut-job.

This film explores the common answers people give such as poverty, violent video games and music. He suggests that this might have very little educational value and the girls he interviews generally agree, noting how Harris and Klebold led introverted lifestyles and careless attitudes towards the game, and that nobody thought twice about it.Comedic, chilling and provocative, "Bowling for Columbine" is a documentary that works as a hugely entertaining movie, as well as a ‘shot’ at American gun culture and the media.

- Film Analysis of Bowling for Columbine by Michael Moore In the recent film “Bowling for Columbine,” Michael Moore claims that fear drives people to violence; a short animation clip is also used by Michael Moore to depict the history of the United States in the documentary.

Apr 07,  · Word Analysis Of Bowling For Columbine Directed By Michael Moore The use of editing, sound and inclusion of comedy satire within Bowling For Columbine [1] both influence the audience’s viewpoint and add towards the overall message of the film.

Apr 07,  · Word Analysis Of Bowling For Columbine Directed By Michael Moore The use of editing, sound and inclusion of comedy satire within Bowling For Columbine [1] both influence the audience’s viewpoint and add towards the overall message of the film.

“Are we just a nation of gun nuts or are we just nuts”; a quote from Michael Moore spoken on his documentary ‘Bowling for Columbine’ where he displays his unique process of integration and analysis to come to the truth about America’s necessity of guns.

An Analysis of Michael Moore's Documentary, Bowling for Columbine Words | 4 Pages. Bowling for Columbine is a documentary about how guns are a bad influence and pollute the mind, rather than supplying safety, which is the real reason behind the possession of a gun being legalised.

Download
An analysis of documentary bowling for columbine by michael moore
Rated 3/5 based on 95 review